Republish this content

<h1>Winona LaDuke on the Dakota Access Pipeline: What Would Sitting Bull Do?</h1>
 <p>It&rsquo;s 2016, and the weight of American corporate interests has come to the Missouri River, the Mother River. This time, instead of the Seventh Cavalry, or the Indian police dispatched to assassinate Sitting Bull, it is Enbridge and Dakota Access Pipeline.</p>  <p>In mid-August, Standing Rock Tribal Chairman Dave Archambault II was arrested by state police, along with 27 others, for opposing the Dakota Access Pipeline. In the meantime, North Dakota Gov. Jack Dalrymple called for more police support.</p>  <p>Every major pipeline project in North America must cross indigenous lands, Indian Country. That is a problem.</p>  <p>The road west of Fargo is rarely taken. In fact, most Americans just fly over North Dakota, never seeing it.</p>  <p>Let me take you there.</p>  <hr style="width: 50%;" width="50%"><p>My head clears as I drive. My destination is the homeland of the Hunkpapa Oceti, Standing Rock Reservation. It is early evening, the moon full. If you close your eyes, you can remember the 50 million buffalo&mdash;the single largest migratory herd in the world. The pounding of their hooves would vibrate the Earth, make the grass grow.</p>  <p>There were once 250 species of grass. Today the buffalo are gone, replaced by 28 million cattle, which require grain, water, and hay. Many of the fields are now in a single GMO crop, full of so many pesticides that the monarch butterflies are dying off. But in my memory, the old world remains.</p>  <p>If you drive long enough, you come to the Missouri River.</p>  <p>Called Mnisose, a great swirling river, by the Lakota, she is a force to be reckoned with. She is breathtaking. &ldquo;The Missouri River has a fixed place in the history and mythology&rdquo; of the Lakota and other Indigenous nations of the Northern Plains, author Dakota Goodhouse would explain.</p>  <p>In the time before Sitting Bull, the Missouri River was the epicenter of northern agriculture, the river bed so fertile. The territory was known as the fertile crescent of North America. That was then, before the treaties that reduced the Lakota land base. But the Missouri remained in the treaty&mdash;the last treaty of 1868 used the Missouri as a boundary.</p>  <p>Then came the theft of land by the U.S. government, and the taking of the Black Hills in 1877, in part as retaliation against Sitting Bull&rsquo;s victory at the Battle of the Little Big Horn. In a time prior to Black Lives Matter or Native Lives Matter, great leaders like Sitting Bull and Crazy Horse were assassinated at the hands of police.</p>  <p>One truth: the Lakota people have survived much.</p>  <blockquote>Every major pipeline project in North America must cross indigenous lands.</blockquote>  <p>Forced into the reservation life, the Lakota attempted to stabilize their society, until the dams came. The 1944 Pick Sloan project flooded out the Missouri River tribes, taking the best bottom lands from the Mandan, Hidatsa, and Arikara, the Lakota and Dakota. Over 200,000 acres on the Standing Rock and Cheyenne River reservations in South Dakota were flooded by the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oahe_Dam">Oahe Dam</a> itself, forcing not only relocation, but a loss of the Lakota world. The <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garrison_Dam">Garrison</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Oahe_Dame&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1">Oahe</a>, and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_Randall_Dam">Fort Randall</a> dams created a reservoir that eliminated 90 percent of timber and 75 percent of wildlife on the reservations.</p>  <p>That is how a people are made poor.</p>  <p>Today, well over two thirds of the population of Standing Rock is below the poverty level&mdash;and the land and Mother River are what remains, a constant, for the people. That is what is threatened today.</p>  <p>Enbridge and partners are preparing to drill through the riverbed. The pipeline has been permitted in sections from the west and from the east. The northern portion was moved away from the water supply of Bismarck, into the watershed of Standing Rock. That was unfortunate for the Lakota.</p>  <p>Despite Lakota legal and regulatory objections, the Dakota Access Pipeline construction began in May 2016. If finished it will snake through North and South Dakota, Iowa, and Illinois, where it will link to a 774-mile pipeline to Nederland, Texas.</p>  <p>More than 570,000 barrels of Bakken crude oil will pass through the pipeline daily, along with 245,100 metric tons of carbon daily&mdash;enough carbon to combust the planet to oblivion.</p>  <p>The pipeline would span 200 water crossings, and in North Dakota alone would pass through 33 historical and archeological sites. Enbridge just bought the Dakota Access pipeline, noting that the proposed Sandpiper route&mdash;Minnesota&rsquo;s 640,000 barrel per day Bakken line&mdash;is now three years behind schedule.</p>  <blockquote>Standing Rock claims the project violates federal and treaty law.</blockquote>  <p>In late July, the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe represented by Earthjustice, filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia against the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Standing Rock claims the project violates federal and treaty law. Standing Rock also filed an intervention at the United Nations, in coordination with the International Indian Treaty Council.</p>  <p>As Chairman Archambault explained in a New York Times story:</p>  <p>&ldquo;The Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of the Interior and the National Advisory Council on Historic Preservation supported more protection of the tribe&rsquo;s cultural heritage, but the Corps of Engineers and Energy Transfer Partners turned a blind eye to our rights. The first draft of the company&rsquo;s assessment of the planned route through our treaty and ancestral lands did not even mention our tribe.</p>  <p>&ldquo;The Dakota Access pipeline was fast-tracked from Day 1 using the Nationwide Permit No. 12 process, which grants exemption from environmental reviews required by the Clean Water Act and the National Environmental Policy Act by treating the pipeline as a series of small construction sites.</p>  <p>&ldquo;Without closer scrutiny, the proposal breezed through the four state processes.&rdquo;</p>  <p>In Iowa where work on the pipeline is underway, three fires erupted causing heavy damage to equipment and an estimated $1 million in damages. Investigators suspect arson, according to Jasper County Sheriff John Halferty. In October 2015, three Iowa farmers sued Dakota Access LLC and the Iowa Utilities Board in an attempt to prevent the use of eminent domain on their properties to construct the pipeline.</p>  <hr style="width: 50%;" width="50%"><p>The health of the Missouri River has been taken for granted.</p>  <p>Dammed in the Pick Sloan Dam projects, each project increases contamination and reduces her health. Today, the Missouri is the seventh most polluted river in the country. Agricultural run-off and now fracking have contaminated the river. My sister fished a gar out of the river, a giant prehistoric fish, only to find it covered with tumors.</p>  <p>Here&rsquo;s just one case: In a January 2015 spill, saltwater contamination from a massive pipeline spill reached the Missouri River. In the baffling way of state and federal agencies, North Dakota&rsquo;s Health Director David Glatt did not expect harm to wildlife or drinking water supplies because the water was diluted. The saying is: &ldquo;The solution to pollution is dilution.&rdquo; That is convenient, but not true.</p>  <p>Blacktail Creek and the Little Muddy River were contaminated after nearly 3 million gallons of saltwater with elevated levels of chloride contamination. All was diluted. But then there was that gar fish with the tumors.</p>  <p>There are pipelines everywhere, and fewer than 150 Pipeline Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) pipeline inspectors in the whole country.</p>  <p>And now comes the risk from oil.</p>  <blockquote>&ldquo;I am here to advise anyone that will listen that the Dakota Access Pipeline project is harmful.&rdquo;</blockquote>  <p>The pipeline companies generally discuss a 99 percent safety record, but studies have found that to be grossly inaccurate. A former Scientific American Editor, Trudy Bell, reports that PHMSA data from 2001 to 2011 suggest the average pipeline &ldquo;has a 57% probability of experiencing a major leak, with consequences over the $l million range in a ten year period.&rdquo;</p>  <p>Not good odds.</p>  <p>At Standing Rock, as the number of protesters grew from 200 to 2000, state law enforcement decided to put up a safety checkpoint and rerouted traffic on Highway 1806 from Bismarck to Standing Rock, hoping to dissuade people from coming and put the squeeze on Standing Rock&rsquo;s Prairie Knights Casino, which is served by that road.</p>  <p>We just drove around; the scenic route is beautiful. And as supporters surge in numbers, the casino hotel and restaurants are full.</p>  <p>While North Dakota seeks to punish the Lakota, Chairman Archambault expresses concerns for everyone:</p>  <p>From the New York Times: &ldquo;I am here to advise anyone that will listen that the Dakota Access Pipeline project is harmful. It will not be just harmful to my people but its intent and construction will harm the water in the Missouri River, which is one of the cleanest and safest river tributaries left in the Unit States. To poison the water is to poison the substance of life. Everything that moves must have water. How can we talk about and knowingly poison water?&rdquo;</p>  <p><figure><img src="/wp-content/uploads/imports/5996d7226e5f4b2e99169dc903bce771.jpg"><figcaption><span><p><span>“Resistance” sign at the site of t</span><span>he drill pad back in May. </span><span>Photo by Desiree Kane.</span></p></span></figcaption></figure></p>  <p>In the meantime, North Dakota Gov. Dalrymple announced a state of emergency, making additional state resources available &ldquo;to manage public safety risks associated with the ongoing protest of the Dakota Access Pipeline.&rdquo; He may have exceeded his scope of authority and violated civil and human rights to water.</p>  <p>Chairman Archambault&rsquo;s interpretation: &ldquo;Perhaps only in North Dakota, where oil tycoons wine and dine elected officials, and where the governor, Jack Dalrymple, serves as an adviser to the Trump campaign, would state and county governments act as the armed enforcement for corporate interests.&rdquo;</p>  <blockquote>The Standing Rock protest camp represents that struggle for freedom, and the future of a people.</blockquote>  <p>There are a lot of people at Standing Rock today who remember their history and the long standoff at Wounded Knee in 1973. In fact, some of those in Standing Rock today were there in 1973 at Wounded Knee, a similar battle for dignity and the future of a nation.</p>  <p>I am not sure how badly North Dakota wants this pipeline. If there is to be a battle over the pipeline, it will be here. For a people with nothing else but a land and a river, I would not bet against them.</p>  <p>The great Lakota leader Mathew King once said, &ldquo;the only thing sadder than an Indian who is not free, is an Indian who does not remember what it is to be free.&rdquo;</p>  <p>The Standing Rock protest camp represents that struggle for freedom, and the future of a people. All of us. If I ask the question &ldquo;What would Sitting Bull do?&rdquo; &mdash;the answer is pretty clear. He would remind me what he said 150 years ago: &ldquo;Let us put our minds together to see what kind of future we can make for our children.&rdquo;</p>  <p>The time for that is now.</p>  <p><span><em>This article was originally published by</em><i>&nbsp;</i><em><a href="https://www.laprogressive.com/protesting-dakota-access-pipeline/" target="_self" title="" rel="noopener noreferrer">LA Progressive</a>.</em></span></p>
<p>This article originally appeared in <a href="https://www.yesmagazine.org">Yes! Magazine</a> at <a href="https://www.yesmagazine.org/environment/2016/08/29/an-oil-pipeline-and-a-river-what-would-sitting-bull-do">https://www.yesmagazine.org/environment/2016/08/29/an-oil-pipeline-and-a-river-what-would-sitting-bull-do</a>.</p><link href="https://www.yesmagazine.org/environment/2016/08/29/an-oil-pipeline-and-a-river-what-would-sitting-bull-do" rel="canonical"/><p>Yes! Magazine is a nonprofit, independent media organization dedicated to telling stories of ... . Learn more at <a href="https://www.yesmagazine.org">Yes! Magazine</a></p><img id="republication-tracker-tool-source" src="https://www.yesmagazine.org/?republication-pixel=true&post=12010&ga4=G-74QJNNY44Z" style="width:1px;height:1px;">

Winona LaDuke on the Dakota Access Pipeline: What Would Sitting Bull Do?
 It’s 2016, and the weight of American corporate interests has come to the Missouri River, the Mother River. This time, instead of the Seventh Cavalry, or the Indian police dispatched to assassinate Sitting Bull, it is Enbridge and Dakota Access Pipeline.  In mid-August, Standing Rock Tribal Chairman Dave Archambault II was arrested by state police, along with 27 others, for opposing the Dakota Access Pipeline. In the meantime, North Dakota Gov. Jack Dalrymple called for more police support.  Every major pipeline project in North America must cross indigenous lands, Indian Country. That is a problem.  The road west of Fargo is rarely taken. In fact, most Americans just fly over North Dakota, never seeing it.  Let me take you there.  My head clears as I drive. My destination is the homeland of the Hunkpapa Oceti, Standing Rock Reservation. It is early evening, the moon full. If you close your eyes, you can remember the 50 million buffalo—the single largest migratory herd in the world. The pounding of their hooves would vibrate the Earth, make the grass grow.  There were once 250 species of grass. Today the buffalo are gone, replaced by 28 million cattle, which require grain, water, and hay. Many of the fields are now in a single GMO crop, full of so many pesticides that the monarch butterflies are dying off. But in my memory, the old world remains.  If you drive long enough, you come to the Missouri River.  Called Mnisose, a great swirling river, by the Lakota, she is a force to be reckoned with. She is breathtaking. “The Missouri River has a fixed place in the history and mythology” of the Lakota and other Indigenous nations of the Northern Plains, author Dakota Goodhouse would explain.  In the time before Sitting Bull, the Missouri River was the epicenter of northern agriculture, the river bed so fertile. The territory was known as the fertile crescent of North America. That was then, before the treaties that reduced the Lakota land base. But the Missouri remained in the treaty—the last treaty of 1868 used the Missouri as a boundary.  Then came the theft of land by the U.S. government, and the taking of the Black Hills in 1877, in part as retaliation against Sitting Bull’s victory at the Battle of the Little Big Horn. In a time prior to Black Lives Matter or Native Lives Matter, great leaders like Sitting Bull and Crazy Horse were assassinated at the hands of police.  One truth: the Lakota people have survived much.  Every major pipeline project in North America must cross indigenous lands.  Forced into the reservation life, the Lakota attempted to stabilize their society, until the dams came. The 1944 Pick Sloan project flooded out the Missouri River tribes, taking the best bottom lands from the Mandan, Hidatsa, and Arikara, the Lakota and Dakota. Over 200,000 acres on the Standing Rock and Cheyenne River reservations in South Dakota were flooded by the Oahe Dam itself, forcing not only relocation, but a loss of the Lakota world. The Garrison, Oahe, and Fort Randall dams created a reservoir that eliminated 90 percent of timber and 75 percent of wildlife on the reservations.  That is how a people are made poor.  Today, well over two thirds of the population of Standing Rock is below the poverty level—and the land and Mother River are what remains, a constant, for the people. That is what is threatened today.  Enbridge and partners are preparing to drill through the riverbed. The pipeline has been permitted in sections from the west and from the east. The northern portion was moved away from the water supply of Bismarck, into the watershed of Standing Rock. That was unfortunate for the Lakota.  Despite Lakota legal and regulatory objections, the Dakota Access Pipeline construction began in May 2016. If finished it will snake through North and South Dakota, Iowa, and Illinois, where it will link to a 774-mile pipeline to Nederland, Texas.  More than 570,000 barrels of Bakken crude oil will pass through the pipeline daily, along with 245,100 metric tons of carbon daily—enough carbon to combust the planet to oblivion.  The pipeline would span 200 water crossings, and in North Dakota alone would pass through 33 historical and archeological sites. Enbridge just bought the Dakota Access pipeline, noting that the proposed Sandpiper route—Minnesota’s 640,000 barrel per day Bakken line—is now three years behind schedule.  Standing Rock claims the project violates federal and treaty law.  In late July, the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe represented by Earthjustice, filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia against the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Standing Rock claims the project violates federal and treaty law. Standing Rock also filed an intervention at the United Nations, in coordination with the International Indian Treaty Council.  As Chairman Archambault explained in a New York Times story:  “The Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of the Interior and the National Advisory Council on Historic Preservation supported more protection of the tribe’s cultural heritage, but the Corps of Engineers and Energy Transfer Partners turned a blind eye to our rights. The first draft of the company’s assessment of the planned route through our treaty and ancestral lands did not even mention our tribe.  “The Dakota Access pipeline was fast-tracked from Day 1 using the Nationwide Permit No. 12 process, which grants exemption from environmental reviews required by the Clean Water Act and the National Environmental Policy Act by treating the pipeline as a series of small construction sites.  “Without closer scrutiny, the proposal breezed through the four state processes.”  In Iowa where work on the pipeline is underway, three fires erupted causing heavy damage to equipment and an estimated $1 million in damages. Investigators suspect arson, according to Jasper County Sheriff John Halferty. In October 2015, three Iowa farmers sued Dakota Access LLC and the Iowa Utilities Board in an attempt to prevent the use of eminent domain on their properties to construct the pipeline.  The health of the Missouri River has been taken for granted.  Dammed in the Pick Sloan Dam projects, each project increases contamination and reduces her health. Today, the Missouri is the seventh most polluted river in the country. Agricultural run-off and now fracking have contaminated the river. My sister fished a gar out of the river, a giant prehistoric fish, only to find it covered with tumors.  Here’s just one case: In a January 2015 spill, saltwater contamination from a massive pipeline spill reached the Missouri River. In the baffling way of state and federal agencies, North Dakota’s Health Director David Glatt did not expect harm to wildlife or drinking water supplies because the water was diluted. The saying is: “The solution to pollution is dilution.” That is convenient, but not true.  Blacktail Creek and the Little Muddy River were contaminated after nearly 3 million gallons of saltwater with elevated levels of chloride contamination. All was diluted. But then there was that gar fish with the tumors.  There are pipelines everywhere, and fewer than 150 Pipeline Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) pipeline inspectors in the whole country.  And now comes the risk from oil.  “I am here to advise anyone that will listen that the Dakota Access Pipeline project is harmful.”  The pipeline companies generally discuss a 99 percent safety record, but studies have found that to be grossly inaccurate. A former Scientific American Editor, Trudy Bell, reports that PHMSA data from 2001 to 2011 suggest the average pipeline “has a 57% probability of experiencing a major leak, with consequences over the $l million range in a ten year period.”  Not good odds.  At Standing Rock, as the number of protesters grew from 200 to 2000, state law enforcement decided to put up a safety checkpoint and rerouted traffic on Highway 1806 from Bismarck to Standing Rock, hoping to dissuade people from coming and put the squeeze on Standing Rock’s Prairie Knights Casino, which is served by that road.  We just drove around; the scenic route is beautiful. And as supporters surge in numbers, the casino hotel and restaurants are full.  While North Dakota seeks to punish the Lakota, Chairman Archambault expresses concerns for everyone:  From the New York Times: “I am here to advise anyone that will listen that the Dakota Access Pipeline project is harmful. It will not be just harmful to my people but its intent and construction will harm the water in the Missouri River, which is one of the cleanest and safest river tributaries left in the Unit States. To poison the water is to poison the substance of life. Everything that moves must have water. How can we talk about and knowingly poison water?”  “Resistance” sign at the site of the drill pad back in May. Photo by Desiree Kane.  In the meantime, North Dakota Gov. Dalrymple announced a state of emergency, making additional state resources available “to manage public safety risks associated with the ongoing protest of the Dakota Access Pipeline.” He may have exceeded his scope of authority and violated civil and human rights to water.  Chairman Archambault’s interpretation: “Perhaps only in North Dakota, where oil tycoons wine and dine elected officials, and where the governor, Jack Dalrymple, serves as an adviser to the Trump campaign, would state and county governments act as the armed enforcement for corporate interests.”  The Standing Rock protest camp represents that struggle for freedom, and the future of a people.  There are a lot of people at Standing Rock today who remember their history and the long standoff at Wounded Knee in 1973. In fact, some of those in Standing Rock today were there in 1973 at Wounded Knee, a similar battle for dignity and the future of a nation.  I am not sure how badly North Dakota wants this pipeline. If there is to be a battle over the pipeline, it will be here. For a people with nothing else but a land and a river, I would not bet against them.  The great Lakota leader Mathew King once said, “the only thing sadder than an Indian who is not free, is an Indian who does not remember what it is to be free.”  The Standing Rock protest camp represents that struggle for freedom, and the future of a people. All of us. If I ask the question “What would Sitting Bull do?” —the answer is pretty clear. He would remind me what he said 150 years ago: “Let us put our minds together to see what kind of future we can make for our children.”  The time for that is now.  This article was originally published by LA Progressive.

Republish this content

Inspiration in Your Inbox.